|
The term Web 2.0 was dreamed up to
describe community-driven phenomena such as blogs and wikis and the
enormously priced businesses they inspired.
Wikipedia has become a net success
story
|
But not everyone is buying into the
label.
Participants at a recent Web 2.0
conference organised by Nomades Advanced Technologies Interactive
Workshops (NATIW) in Geneva, Switzerland were scratching their heads as
to what it all means.
Among them were some pretty wily web
veterans, including a member of the team from Europe's Nuclear Research
Centre (Cern) that actually invented the web.
Web 2.0 may not be the different species
some claim, but sort of what they had in mind from the start.
"The original slogan was always to have a
web that was easy to write as it was to read," said Robert Cailliau of
the World Wide Web Consortium.
"We went through a sort of dark ages
where the ideas survived, but the technology needed to catch up, so
where we are now is indeed the point at which the people take control
of the web, make their input, which is what we originally wanted.
"Our idea was for a web that was as easy
to write as to read."
Crowd wisdom
In the early days the web was a static
medium. Early web shops were like a shop front or foyer leading to vast
operations out back. In contrast, web 2.0 is about fluidity and change;
the web itself is the business.
 |
It venerates the amateur
over the expert and tells us we can all collaborate in producing
something worthwhile, even the truth
|
"The reason why so many web Web 1.0 start
ups went bust is that there was so much capital cost involved in
creating a web business because there was still the pretence that
everything had to be created in-house," said Jeffrey Huang, director of
the Media and Design Laboratory at the Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology, Lausanne.
"The big change for me in Web 2.0 is that
you leverage the people's resources."
This is why websites are so keen to
harness what they call the wisdom of crowds.
Businesses are much cheaper to run if you
get your customers to do most of the work generating content.
The best of Web 2.0 attract enough
traffic to add value to the site and make it worthwhile visiting. In
short, the value to users increases with the number of users.
Perhaps that is why users are made to
feel so good about Web 2.0. It venerates the amateur over the expert
and tells us we can all collaborate in producing something worthwhile.
Web wall
But what was most fascinating about the
Geneva conference was that these ideas might actually have far greater
impact outside the internet, in the real world.
Could allowing people to 'interact'
with buildings via SMS catch on?
|
Architecture, for example, is normally
imposed on us from above and carved out in unforgiving stone. But,
taking a cue from the web, some designers are putting the people in
charge of changing the look of buildings.
Germany's Chaos Computer Club placed
lights into the windows of buildings and on hoardings in Berlin and
Paris so anyone could SMS the organisers and scrape the skies with
their designs.
Boston's Swisshouse was designed by
Jeffrey Huang for the Swiss Government and is variously described as a
"prototype networked consulate" and an "inhabitable interface". It
includes digital walls and interactive wallpapers to allow users to
customise their surroundings.
It is architecture that anticipates what
some call the internet of things where the very walls of your office
could eventually interface with the internet.
And a building by Carlo Ratti Associates
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is going to premier next
year at the International Exposition in Zaragoza, Spain. Its pixelated
raining walls can be programmed to do what you like.
Maybe this internet of things then will
become the real departure from the original vision of the web's
founders.
|